Unscientific science
The most beautiful expression of the day would be to hear and expose itself under a denomination of absolute confusion in the foreground, however, towards a purification of truth to take precedence throughout this work of reflection. It is unequivocally undertaken with the promulgation of a neuralgic point of science, strictly speaking the unscientific science. The underlying idea that one would like to imply par excellence is much more complex than the perplexity it raises in us with simple reading. With good courage and clarity of preference, the reflection contained in this article derives from an assertion which will leave us in no way, without any indifference. For the sake of simplicity and introspection, paying attention to relationships that may well exist between three key entities that are formally daily. In this case they are "the human being", "life" and "reality". The chosen research goes in the direction of first to diverge the perspectives in order to converge them all towards a common thesis, which only deals explicitly with the heading of this present report. In any case, essential is it? that our supreme convictions, at a certain moment, at a certain stage of life, should lead us to detach ourselves from the height of the grandeur of consideration as a fact which is true and without absolute contradiction. Irrational to believe that the human being really exists in nature. Indeed, the recognition of the human species is a question of form and not of substance. If we come to distinguish an elephant from an ant, it is because, first, the principle of morphology is fundamentally based on this notion of classification. Very often, any object in a room is deprived of the specific character of beings: that of self-determination. In other words, we all agree that a gust of wind and eye contact with another person are not interpreted in the same way by the mind. There is always this agreement of priority to the thinking entity of a value which itself resituated by its faculty of self-determination, a kind of prestige by nature. But it is not through a soul that we can afford. A lifeless body is not so different from any object. To signify here, that the human being is an invisible species (soul) that seeks a visible identity with this body which serves him to prove his existence on Earth. As a result, the human species exists only by and indirectly through physical visibility. 2 The question of life is the same allegation. I do not attach much here to the subjectivity of the principles, but privilege more and unconditionally the universality of the latter. It makes sense that we are continually caught between days and nights throughout the Earth's journey. You have never wondered if this is the case. To tell the truth, the darkness of the universe makes us plunge into the night and the sunlight into the day. There is no day and night proper, but it is rather the ambush or "dance" of the Earth that gives rise to this sensation and that is so. To simply say that life is this illusion that suggests that everything is normal, logical and real. In this sense, life itself does not hold to logic from several angles. From this condition, does reality constantly mock our consciences? Not at all, she is known to be stable, constant. So where does the disturbing reality come from? From there, starts the cogitation on unscientific science. What is science first and foremost? It is the ability to interact with nature, to understand better, to grasp it, above all else, to want to domesticate it in several forms at will and to the satisfaction of man. The quest for knowledge began the day when man knew the heavy burden of life on Earth. In these precise terms, science is the one that makes us discover reality. But if the latter is utopian, in this case, did not it be wrong in advance on this basis? Quite simple, how to explain with science some plausible eventualities? Like for example a land passage in the Atlantic Ocean as it was in the Red Sea during the exodus of the Hebrew people; the steps of the mountains; the compatibility of incompatible natures; the birth of a sheep by a cave ... etc. It cannot be said that it belongs to the divine manifestation. Absolutely, although we are constantly explaining, we must note that the reality is not as real as it is. Many things are hidden from us. So much so that everything is done to evaluate us and that a much different story exists beyond reality, the human being and life. It should be remembered at the end that science, although an admirer of nature as such, it can sometimes prove to be sometimes contradictory to different degrees. As we have just demonstrated, all that we know of reality is far from being "a logical whole". Once again, certain natural phenomena already discovered persist in the most total blur, this is the case of the rock of Jerusalem is suspended in the air, the mysterious holes that form on the surface of the earth of recent times ... etc.
