The concept of Darwin, a partial and partial theory

Charles Darwin, palaeontology and English naturalist, published in 1859, the book "From the origins of species." Although independent thinker, he had to borrow the hypothesis emitted by Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck, 50 years rather. In fact, almost all of his research is based on three major points: unity, species diversity and natural selection. In truth, the idea that Darwin puts forward his argument is simply illusory, because indeed, in his formulation, he suggested that one constantly keeps the excavations of remains of spaces to support his postulates.

It is very damaging to see the birth of a Darwinism current that persists with determination, educating the new generations of values ​​that do not conform to the principles of scientificity and that defends truthful facts as mere facts. In spite of what, I would demonstrate in this article the unfoundedness of Darwin's theories on the human lineage in general.

From the point of view of the uniqueness of human beings, it is necessary to ascertain by nature the true existence of a relative similarity between several living beings more on the anatomical than on the morphological level; chromosomal; molecular ... etc. As well for the species of the same medium as those of the distinct environments. This should not, under any circumstances let us think of the idea of ​​a common ancestor. The evolution of a being "origin" or plural as presupposes Darwinism can not explain the settlement of the billions of billions of living species on Earth. This constitutes a misinterpretation of nature and its evolution. In principle, the commonality between species is irrefutable and must be seen from the angle of belonging to the same supreme being and not to the same common ancestor. Now it is amazing to explain an infinite multiplicity of beings, knowing that others are undiscovered until 2018 as being a drift of one or more common ancestors. On the principle of science, phylogeny is not in line with the evolution of species in a much more global dimension, it is partial and partial in its concept. Time would not be the mastermind of the "magic" differentiation of these species. In the excavation of skeletal remains, discoveries constantly call into question even the relative consideration of Darwin's principles. In 2004, a team of prospecting Aramco Exploration Team would have discovered, besides in Saudi Arabia a human skeleton of outsized proportions. The finding of remains of the giant men would be the incontestable proof of the basis of Darwinism thought.

With regard to the diversity of living things, it is quite clear that nature is balanced by this principle, it is necessary and unconditional diversity to allow the longevity of life on Earth. In this sense, all species intertwine with each other. This diversity can not be denounced, it is welcomed without exception, Again, it must be remembered that plants are living beings and that the earth is so. I can not understand how Darwin could think of these beings. Descartes in his explanation brings about the origin of the mistakes that rushing further pushes people to make mistakes. Darwin's attitude is the perfect example. This diversity, in fact, derives from the ingenuity of a supreme being unequivocal and unambiguous. Finally, natural selection, although defined as the equilibrium of the environmental balance over species over time. It is quite complex to be able to understand in a complete dimension. Reproduction of some species is in favor of others. The disparity of others is advantageous for future new species, which can derive from minority strains. The complex environment, predator and prey governs this complex principle par excellence.

In conclusion, to think that uniqueness gives way to the diversity of species is illusory. Although natural selection is the driving force behind the evolution of species over time. It is not the latter that determines the period between the uniqueness and the diversity of species. The mystery of the uniqueness of living beings still remains to be seen, in my opinion it is the manifestation of a supreme being which defines it. The diversity of beings is an essential essence for the stability and continuity of life on Earth. The role of natural selection should be understood as the interaction between environment and species. From these points of view, there is no common ancestor in the human lineage with apes. The only similarity can not justify this, it is the utopian drift of the currents Darwinisms.