2026-05-16

Intra-Annual NDVI Time-Series Reconstruction by Combining EEMD and Breakpoint Analysis – Application to Godoria Mangrove Ecosystem


 

 

 

Pixel 1 vs Pixel 2 : Time series without Missing NDVI value

  1. Inter annual NDVI variation from Landsat 5/7/8/9 (30 m) over the period 1984-2023. (b) mean monthly NDVI variation.

  

 

1. Seasonally Decomposed Missing Value Imputation [Pixel 1] 

  • (R. B. Cleveland, W. S. Cleveland, J.E. McRae, and I. Terpenning (1990) STL: A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Procedure Based on Loess. Journal of Official Statistics, 6, 3–73.)

 

 

  1. Reconstructing NDVI Time-Series Based on EEMD and BreakPoint on C internnual component.

 

 

   2.5 %        breakpoints      97.5 %

1   1992(9)    1992(12)          1993(2)

2   1998(10)   1998(12)         2001(6)

3   2006(10)   2006(11)         2007(2)

4 2013(8)       2013(9)          2015(5)

 

 


 © 2026 The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi)All rights reserved.

LinkedIn group page: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/ 
 

馃彌️ tABCi Laboratories :


馃И Abdi-Basid ADAN LABS  Focus: Interdisciplinary Sciences & Education.

馃 The Deep Thinking Lab Focus: Philosophy & Human Sciences.

馃實 The EcoClimate Hub Focus: Climate Science & Environment.

Contact : Abdi-Basid ADAN [abdi-basid@outlook.com]


 © 2017-2026 The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi). All rights reserved

2026-01-01

Comparative Evaluation of Time Series Forecasting Models for Monthly Industrial Production in Electric and Gas Utilities: From Classical SARIMAX to Deep Learning Approaches

Websitehttps://sites.google.com/view/theabdibasidcoursesinstitut/accueil


Description of the Code Objectives: This code conducts a comprehensive analysis and empirical comparison of univariate forecasting methods applied to a historical monthly time series: the Industrial Production Index for U.S. electric and gas utilities (FRED series IPG2211A2N, spanning 1939 to approximately 2019–2020).


The main objectives are as follows: Exploratory Analysis and Preprocessing: Examine stationarity, identify trend and strong seasonality (annual cycles related to energy consumption), and prepare the series for modeling through differencing and decomposition. Comparison of Forecasting Paradigms: Assess the performance of classical statistical models (SARIMAX), tree-based methods (Random Forest with recursive reduction), interpretable neural models (N-BEATS), attention-based architectures (Temporal Fusion Transformer), and probabilistic deep learning models (DeepAR) over a 12-month forecast horizon. Objective Evaluation: Compute MSE/RMSE on a held-out test period to determine which approach—traditional, machine learning, or deep learning—best captures the trend, seasonal, and nonlinear patterns of this critical economic series. Practical Implications: In the energy sector, accurate forecasting of electricity and gas production supports capacity planning, management of seasonal and climate-related risks, and anticipation of industrial demand—particularly important in the context of the energy transition and fluctuating consumption patterns.

Figures:




馃幆 The detailed methodology and results can be accessed through this link:

馃憠click here now! :  https://github.com/abdibasidadan-byte


 © 2026 The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi)All rights reserved.

LinkedIn group page: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/ 
 

馃彌️ tABCi Laboratories :


馃И Abdi-Basid ADAN LABS  Focus: Interdisciplinary Sciences & Education.

馃 The Deep Thinking Lab Focus: Philosophy & Human Sciences.

馃實 The EcoClimate Hub Focus: Climate Science & Environment.

Contact : Abdi-Basid ADAN [abdi-basid@outlook.com]


 © 2017-2026 The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi). All rights reserved

2025-12-31

Evaluation of Zero-Shot Transformer Models for Real-Time Churn Intent Classification

Main Objective

To implement a non-linear NLP (Natural Language Processing) pipeline capable of categorizing unstructured customer feedback without prior task-specific training.

Model Output :

Text: "I think the subscription has become too expensive for what it is." Prediction: Churn Risk (Confidence: 0.58).

Text: "I love my plan, the network is great everywhere!" Prediction: Support Request (Confidence: 0.36).

Text: "My contract is expiring soon and I'm looking at the competition." Prediction: Support Request (Confidence: 0.52).

Key Takeaways :

For the first result (0.58): > "The model identified a pricing pain point. In natural language processing, 'expensive' is a strong predictor for customer attrition, hence the 'Churn Risk' label.

For the second result (0.36): > "This is a false positive due to a low confidence score. Because the model didn't have a 'Positive' or 'Satisfied' category to choose from, it defaulted to 'Support Request' with very low certainty. We call this a forced choice.

For the third result (0.52): > "The model correctly sensed an intent to switch. Mentioning 'competition' and 'contract expiration' triggers a high probability for a retention-related support ticket."





馃幆 The detailed methodology and results can be accessed through this link:

馃憠click here now! :  https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/



The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi)

LinkedIn group page: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/ 

馃彌️ tABCi Laboratories :


馃И Abdi-Basid ADAN LABS  Focus: Interdisciplinary Sciences & Education.

馃 The Deep Thinking Lab Focus: Philosophy & Human Sciences.

馃實 The EcoClimate Hub Focus: Climate Science & Environment.


@ (c)2025 Abdi-Basid ADAN [abdi-basid@outlook.com]

2025-12-30

Industrial Reliability Study: Predicting APS System Failures in Scania Trucks

Description 

The APS (Air Processing System) is critical for the operation of Scania trucks. APS failures can lead to significant industrial costs and production downtime. Historical sensor data enables the analysis of system behavior and early detection of anomalies before they escalate into critical failures.

In this study, a Random Forest model was trained to detect APS system failures, with special attention given to the highly imbalanced nature of the dataset by applying class weighting to the rare positive instances. Model performance was evaluated using standard metrics including precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrices, while the associated industrial cost was calculated based on the impact of false positives and false negatives. To further optimize failure detection and reduce total costs, XGBoost was optionally employed. Additionally, feature importance analysis was conducted to identify the most critical sensors influencing APS failure predictions, with the top features visualized through horizontal bar charts to provide interpretable insights for industrial decision-making.

Figure 1 illustrates the confusion matrix of the Random Forest model applied to APS failure detection under a highly imbalanced class distribution. The model correctly classifies the majority of non-failure cases, as reflected by the large number of true negatives and the very low number of false positives. This indicates a strong capability to avoid unnecessary maintenance actions. However, a non-negligible number of APS failures are misclassified as normal operations (false negatives), which represent critical cases from an industrial perspective due to their high associated cost. This result emphasizes the importance of cost-sensitive learning and motivates the use of alternative models, such as XGBoost, to further reduce false negatives and optimize industrial cost. In the confusion matrix, the value 15,607 corresponds to true negatives, that is, trucks that do not have an APS system failure and are correctly identified as such by the model, demonstrating its ability to avoid unnecessary maintenance interventions.

Figure 2 presents the top 15 most influential sensor variables used by the Random Forest model to predict APS failures. The results indicate that the prediction is driven by a limited subset of sensors, with aa_000 being the most dominant feature, followed by ci_000, ck_000, and dn_000. This suggests that APS failures are strongly associated with specific operational measurements rather  than uniformly across all sensors. The concentration of importance among these variables highlights their potential relevance for targeted monitoring and preventive maintenance strategies, as focusing on key sensors could improve fault detection efficiency while reducing system complexity.


Conclusion

The experimental results confirm that the proposed machine learning approach is effective for detecting failures of the Air Pressure System (APS) in heavy-duty trucks. The Random Forest model achieved a high overall accuracy (≈99%) and a strong precision for the negative class, indicating reliable identification of non-failure cases. However, the recall for APS failures remained moderate (≈58–61%), highlighting the intrinsic difficulty of detecting rare failure events in highly imbalanced industrial datasets.

The integration of class weighting significantly reduced the number of false negatives, which are associated with the highest industrial cost. Using the defined cost function, the Random Forest model resulted in a total industrial cost of approximately 74,000–78,000 units, demonstrating a meaningful improvement over non–cost-aware baselines. Furthermore, the XGBoost model substantially outperformed Random Forest in cost optimization, reducing the total industrial cost to approximately 29,850 units, primarily by further decreasing missed APS failures.

Feature importance analysis revealed that a limited set of sensor variables (e.g., aa_000, ci_000, ck_000, dn_000) consistently contributed most to the predictive performance. This suggests that APS degradation can be detected through specific operational patterns captured by onboard sensors. Overall, these results validate the relevance of cost-sensitive learning for industrial reliability studies and demonstrate the practical value of data-driven predictive maintenance in intelligent transportation systems.



馃幆 The detailed methodology and results can be accessed through this link:

馃憠click here now! :  https://github.com/




  
The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi)

馃彌️ tABCi Laboratories :


馃И Abdi-Basid ADAN LABS  Focus: Interdisciplinary Sciences & Education.

馃 The Deep Thinking Lab Focus: Philosophy & Human Sciences.

馃實 The EcoClimate Hub Focus: Climate Science & Environment.


@ (c)2025 Abdi-Basid ADAN [abdi-basid@outlook.com]

NCAA Match Prediction Script Using Logistic Regression

This script aims to predict the probability that a college basketball team wins against another in a match. It leverages historical data on teams, regular season results, and tournament seeds to build a predictive model.

Purpose :
- Understand how to transform raw match data into features usable
by a machine learning model.
- Build a supervised model capable of predicting the match winner.
- Evaluate the model using standard metrics (log loss, ROC-AUC)
and apply it to tournament simulations.

Data :
- "teams": team information (TeamID, TeamName, first and last
Division 1 season)
- "results": regular season match results (winning team, losing team,
score, match day)
- "seed_round_slots": information on tournament seeds and match slots

Variables:
- "team_stats": number of wins and losses per team per season
- "match_data": prepared match dataset for model training
- "X", "y": features and target for training
- "model": trained logistic regression model
- "matchup_example": sample tournament matches for prediction

Model:
- Logistic Regression
- It is supervised because it learns from labeled data: each historical
match has a label "1" if Team1 wins, "0" otherwise.
- Suitable for binary classification and allows estimating the probability
of a team winning.

Objectives:
1. Load the necessary CSV files.
2. Compute wins and losses for each team and season.
3. Create a match dataset ready for training.
4. Normalize the data and split into training and test sets.
5. Train a supervised Logistic Regression model.
6. Evaluate the model using log loss and ROC-AUC.
7. Prepare a sample tournament matchup and predict win probabilities.

馃幆 The detailed methodology and results can be accessed through this link:

馃憠click here now! :  https://github.com/




    
The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi)

LinkedIn group page: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/ 

馃彌️ tABCi Laboratories :


馃И Abdi-Basid ADAN LABS  Focus: Interdisciplinary Sciences & Education.

馃 The Deep Thinking Lab Focus: Philosophy & Human Sciences.

馃實 The EcoClimate Hub Focus: Climate Science & Environment.



@2025 Abdi-Basid ADAN