In the reasoning opposite, it is a special ease of an explanatory monologue
based on a novel idea of a newcomer in the history of science. But above all,
taking a stance for breathtaking attention with the following expressions
including the hematic, rhematic, phreatic or thematic. Notwithstanding, the
phematic the main object praise in this interview, brings us back to the
question of knowing, is that a phematic, or a phematician?
Starting from this
preamble, which holds as an introductory dimension of a luminous idea, according
to which a possible contribution to the future echelons seems decisive. Dear
readers, as you all know, science, in the general sense, is a way for us, on
which we claim to have a mastery of it is that, nature, natural balance and
therefore natural laws. Is it not a tremendous job for man to develop himself
into an activity of reflection leading to a career of life? But to the detriment
of the multiple and complex needs that constantly lurk at us, we are more than
ever forced to go beyond the painful and intrusive work of research. It breaks
down the major obstacles of life, like a show in which constraints take
different forms for multiple reasons. Time is changing and weariness is making
us return to a comfortable lifestyle vision. That said, science since the
Paleolithic; the Mesopotamians, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the man, by his
capacities to evolve, is supposed not to become a victim of the nature and not
for the nature, a submission to the man. Science is at the intermediary service
between man and life by slamming nature. Centuries in the centuries, innovation,
discoveries and the progression of knowledge levels are climbing upward.
The
logic of any kind of knowledge, although a concept known indirectly, does, in
fact, only resume the structure that consists of nature. In all simplicity, any
imagination so naive or not part of an idea, a questioning of reality, which
surrounds us. It was the case of the moon, why would not it have collided with
the Earth? Such has become the cradle of classical and quantum physics. Compared
to nature, a socalled atom represents the element of first constitution with
which matter is formed. This unitary or elementary profile is proliferated, in
two, then in three, until generating a block of idea in an extremely close bond
in order to circumvent the confusion and the refutation. In simple terms, the
origin of a cause, which itself becomes the source of another and so on, in the
same way as a family tree. Noticing, one thing, through which a relationship
with nature is an imminent reality about the structure of a molecule with these
innumerable atomic compositions. We started from an idea to formulate a theory,
a set of notions contributing to a common vision In turn, this theory is
associated with others, which by principle of iteration, form a mega structure
of knowledge, which is called a discipline. Incontestable, to see that we are in
the horizon of the infinitely small towards the infinitely large.
From this
perception, science becomes a perfectly reflective mirror of nature. In more
detail, the Earth as small compared to the sun, the sun as huge as it is in the
solar system becomes, meanwhile, a tiny and invisible celestial object in front
of Arcturus, who in turn becomes it before Betelgeuse ... etc. The latter still
certifies the irreproachable fidelity of science to the composition of nature,
its order and its equilibrium. No reason to want to remind that the physical
equations have good reasons to marry nature. Can we succeed in reconstituting
science, knowledge, and knowledge in a disciplinary unity, thus uniting all
fields of science? This has been the work perpetrated by authors for years,
which finally for today, comes to see the day. I prove the possibility of
designing a unique science from all the different branches of science.
The
phematic then becomes the discipline par excellence of reference, whose
expression stems from the conjunction between philosophy and mathematics
synonymous with the expression mathilosophy. For phematic expert, two skills are
in this sense, required in particular in philosophy and mathematics. No
discipline seems to escape from these complementary doctrines to each other.
Philosophy, science of formulation and cogitation and mathematical science of
confirmation and demonstration. By definition of things, we will always hear, by
phematic, the science of demonstrative cogitation. In a word, it means by mother
of science philosophy and father of science mathematics.
Abdi Basid ADAN
