Charles Darwin, palaeontology and English naturalist, published in 1859, the book"From the origins of species." Although independent thinker, he had to borrow thehypothesis emitted by Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck, 50 years rather. In fact, almost allof his research is based on three major points:
unity, species diversity and naturalselection. In truth, the idea that Darwin puts forward his argument is simply illusory,because indeed, in his formulation, he suggested that one constantly keeps theexcavations of remains of spaces to support his postulates.It is very damaging to see the birth of a Darwinism current that persists withdetermination, educating the new generations of values that do not conform to theprinciples of scientificity and that defends truthful facts as mere facts.
In spite of what,I would demonstrate in this article the unfoundedness of Darwin's theories on thehuman lineage in general.From the point of view of the uniqueness of human beings, it is necessary toascertain by nature the true existence of a relative similarity between several livingbeings more on the anatomical than on the morphological level; chromosomal;molecular ... etc. As well for the species of the same medium as those of the distinctenvironments. This should not, under any circumstances let us think of the idea of acommon ancestor. The evolution of a being "origin" or plural as presupposesDarwinism can not explain the settlement of the billions of billions of living species onEarth. This constitutes a misinterpretation of nature and its evolution. In principle, thecommonality between species is irrefutable and must be seen from the angle ofbelonging to the same supreme being and not to the same common ancestor. Now itis amazing to explain an infinite multiplicity of beings, knowing that others areundiscovered until 2018 as being a drift of one or more common ancestors. On theprinciple of science, phylogeny is not in line with the evolution of species in a muchmore global dimension, it is partial and partial in its concept. Time would not be themastermind of the "magic" differentiation of these species. In the excavation ofskeletal remains, discoveries constantly call into question even the relativeconsideration of Darwin's principles. In 2004, a team of prospecting AramcoExploration Team would have discovered, besides in Saudi Arabia a human skeleton
of outsized proportions. The finding of remains of the giant men would be theincontestable proof of the basis of Darwinism thought.With regard to the diversity of living things, it is quite clear that nature is balanced bythis principle, it is necessary and unconditional diversity to allow the longevity of lifeon Earth. In this sense, all species intertwine with each other. This diversity can notbe denounced, it is welcomed without exception, Again, it must be remembered thatplants are living beings and that the earth is so. I can not understand how Darwin could think of these beings. Descartes in his explanation brings about the origin ofthe mistakes that rushing further pushes people to make mistakes. Darwin's attitudeis the perfect example. This diversity, in fact, derives from the ingenuity of a supremebeing unequivocal and unambiguous. Finally, natural selection, although defined asthe equilibrium of the environmental balance over species over time.
It is quitecomplex to be able to understand in a complete dimension. Reproduction of somespecies is in favor of others. The disparity of others is advantageous for future newspecies, which can derive from minority strains. The complex environment, predatorand prey governs this complex principle par excellence.In conclusion, to think that uniqueness gives way to the diversity of species is illusory.Although natural selection is the driving force behind the evolution of species overtime. It is not the latter that determines the period between the uniqueness and thediversity of species. The mystery of the uniqueness of living beings still remains to beseen, in my opinion it is the manifestation of a supreme being which defines it. Thediversity of beings is an essential essence for the stability and continuity of life onEarth. The role of natural selection should be understood as the interaction betweenenvironment and species. From these points of view, there is no common ancestor inthe human lineage with apes. The only similarity can not justify this, it is the utopiandrift of the currents Darwinisms.
Abdi-Basid ADAN, 2018.
© 2026 The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi). All rights reserved.
馃實 The EcoClimate Hub | Focus: Climate Science & Environment.
Contact : Abdi-Basid ADAN [abdi-basid@outlook.com]
© 2017-2026 The Abdi-Basid Courses Institute (tABCi). All rights reserved.